United States v. Benito Martinez-Ipina
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Benito Martinez-Ipina has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Ipina has submitted an untimely response challenging his conviction. Even if it were timely, because the record reflects that Martinez-Ipina knowingly decided not to appeal his conviction, we will not address the issues raised in his response. See United States v. Polanco-Ozorto, 772 F.3d 1053,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. FloresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Jose Polanco-OzortoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014