Legal Opinion

United States v. Benito Martinez-Ipina

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 16, 2017No. 17-40382 Summary CalendarUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Benito Martinez-Ipina has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Ipina has submitted an untimely response challenging his conviction. Even if it were timely, because the record reflects that Martinez-Ipina knowingly decided not to appeal his conviction, we will not address the issues raised in his response. See United States v. Polanco-Ozorto, 772 F.3d 1053,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. FloresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Jose Polanco-OzortoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API