Legal Opinion

Ravetz v. Upjohn Company

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 4, 1955No. Civ. A. 14596PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GANEY, District Judge.

The action here involved was instituted on December 16, 1952, on behalf of Jane Eavetz, a minor, by her guardians and parents, Dr. Elkin Eavetz and his wife Betty, and by the latter in their own right. They claim damages for injuries sustained by her as the result of the injection of an allegedly defective antibiotic supplied by the defendant. 1

Two groups, one the Miller group, involving over eighty persons, the other, the Friedenberg group, comprising six individuals, have sought to be joined as plaintiffs in the action. This court has allowed the joinder of the Miller…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Jones v. Boggs & Buhl, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Van Dyke v. BroadhurstDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1939

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schnebly Ex Rel. Schnebly v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Wilson v. Sharon Steel CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Conard v. StitzelDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Hardware Dealers Mutual Insurance v. R. H. Hidey, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Joseph Thompson and Leola Thompson, His Wife v. Harry C. Erb, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API