Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Ferguson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 22, 1926No. 214. [fn*]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRidgell, J.

Separate applications were made by Joe Lee Ferguson and Alex M. Ferguson, respectively, in the county court of Haskell county, for the probate of the following instrument, alleged to b'e the last will of their sister, Kate F. Morton, which instru'ment is as follows:

“Telephone No. 53. Post Office Box 92.
“Last Will of Kate F. Morton.
“Haskell, Texas, May 5th, 1924.
“I am going on a journey and I may never come back alive, so I make this will; but.X expect to make changes if I live.
“First, I want a hospital built in Haskell in memory of my husband, Francis Marion, to cost $50,000 (fifty thousand…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Leggett v. . FirthNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Eaton v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. McCarty v. ChalfantWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Dougherty v. HolscheiderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. Magee v. McNeilMississippi Supreme Court · 1866

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Corpus Christi Bank & Trust v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Succession of GurganusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  4. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Succession of GurganusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API