Legal Opinion
In Re Cambridge Literary Properties, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 20, 2001No. 01-1859PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
Cambridge Literary Properties, Ltd. (“Cambridge”) has filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this court to direct the district court to approve a proffered statement, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 10(c) (“Rule 10(c) Statement”). Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy requiring “(1) a showing of some special risk of irreparable harm, and (2) a demonstration of clear entitlement to the relief requested, i.e., that the district court’s order is palpably erroneous.” Bennett v. City of Boston, 54 F.3d 18, 21 (1st Cir.1995).
To the extent that the district court declined to approve the Rule…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rogan v. MeninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Athridge, Thomas P. v. Rivas, HildaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Bennett v. Commonwealth of MACourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- John Barilaro v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, Appeal of New England Produce Center, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. CaramadreCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- In re: JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015