Legal Opinion
Prayze FM v. United States
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 8, 1999No. 3:98CV375(WWE), 3:98CV529(WWE)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65, defendant Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”), seeks an order preliminarily enjoining plaintiffs Prayze FM, Incom LLC, Mark Blake and all persons acting in concert with them from making radio transmissions within the United States until they first obtain a license from the FCC or other appropriate authorization in accordance with 47 U.S.C. sec. 301 et seq. For the reasons below, defendant’s motion is GRANTED.
FACTS
In December 1996, the Field Office of the Compliance and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Citibank, N.A. And Citicorp v. Citytrust and Citytrust Bancorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Fisher-Price, Inc. v. Well-Made Toy Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Prayze Fm, Also Known as Incom, L.L.C., Mark Blake and Loretta Spivey v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Roy NesetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Roy NesetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Roy NesetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000