Commonwealth Financial Systems v. Hartzell
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COX, J,
— Before the court for disposition are the preliminary objections to amended complaint filed on behalf of the defendant James Hartzell, which argue the following:
I. The amended complaint does not contain a specific averment alleging whether the purported agreement between the parties is oral or written, which violates Pa.R.C.P. No. 1019(h);
II. The plaintiff failed to attach the proper cardholder agreement and assignment of the defendant’s account to the amended complaint in violation of Pa.R.C.P. No. 1019(i); and
III. The plaintiff has failed to specifically aver or attach…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Atlantic Credit & Finance, Inc. v. GiulianaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Kirshon, Et Ux. v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Target National Bank v. Kilbride, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County2010
- Marine Bank v. Orlando, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County1982
- Remit Corp. v. Miller, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County2008