Legal Opinion

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION v. SILKMAN

District Court, D. Maine

Decided December 2, 2019No. 1:16-cv-00205Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY ) COMMISSION, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) 1:16-cv-00205-JAW ) RICHARD SILKMAN, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ORDER ON MOTION TO EXCLUDE WITNESS The Court denies a petitioner’s motion to exclude an expert witness designated by the respondents because the Court concludes that the expert is qualified to give the opinions he has rendered, that his opinions are likely to be helpful to the jury, and that the petitioner’s other objections do not justify exclusion. Instead, the petitioner is free to test the expert’s qualifications,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  4. Brenda Payton v. Abbott Labs, Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  5. Samaan v. St. Joseph HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API