Legal Opinion

Town of Scottsdale v. State ex rel. Pickrell

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1965No. 8153PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

On November 21, 1962 the attorney general on behalf of the state of Arizona filed a quo warranto action against the appellant, town of Scottsdale, charging appellant with exercising an unlawful franchise over the area described in the town of Scottsdale’s annexation ordinance 160 adopted November 10, 1962. A.R.S. § 12-2041 (1956).

Judgment whs rendered in the trial court in favor of the state, from which the appellant perfected this appeal. The trial court found: (1) appellant did not obtain signatures of owners representing one half of the value of the real and personal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. AnwayArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. McCune v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  3. City of Tucson v. GarrettArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Barlow v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Gorman v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. City of Safford v. Town of ThatcherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. Town of Miami v. City of GlobeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  4. Cornman Tweedy 560, LLC v. City of Casa GrandeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. Fry v. Mayor and City Council of Sierra VistaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API