Legal Opinion

Hedgcock v. People Ex Rel. Arden Realty & Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 6, 1936No. 13,566PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

An action in mandamus. Writ issued requiring plaintiff in error, building inspector of Denver, to grant relator, appearing in the name of the people, defendant in error, a permit to erect a store building on its property. The reason assigned for refusing the permit was that relator’s property is within an area zoned for residence purposes, as evidenced by Denver’s zoning ordinance of 1925.

As to zoning designation, not denied by relator, the contention is that, as applied to its property, the ordinance is “arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable, oppressive and discriminatory,” and operates to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Colby v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. Gabrielson v. Borough of Glen RidgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Carter v. City of BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. City and County of Denver v. Denver Buick, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  3. Cross v. BilettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  4. Weber v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Beszedes v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API