Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 20, 2008No. 06-30010PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OWEN, Circuit Judge:

George W. Williams was originally sentenced prior to the issuance of United States v. Booker, 1 under a mandatory Sentencing Guidelines regime. In a prior appeal, this court held that certain factors did not justify an upward departure from the mandatory Guidelines range. On remand, after Booker was decided, the district court imposed a non-Guidelines sentence greater than the advisory Guidelines range. We hold that the district court did not violate the law of the case in imposing the sentence and that the sentence was not unreasonable. We therefore affirm.

I

George W.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. United States v. Mondragon-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Campos-MaldonadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Lopez-VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. BrantleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. KeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API