Legal Opinion
McTiernan v. Scott
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided September 20, 2001No. 00-203PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
[11] John McTiernan and Donna Dubrow (collectively McTiernan) filed a petition with the Board of Control (Board) seeking an order that Sam and Mona Seott (the Scotts) had abandoned a portion of their water rights. .On remand from our decision in Scott v. McTiernan, 974 P.2d 966 (Wyo.1999) (Scott I) for additional findings of fact, the Board concluded that the Scotts had abandoned 14.8 acres of the 28.8 acre Shalleross property and ordered the Scotts to file a petition for a change of the point of diversion and means of conveyance with the Board. McTiernan appeals from a district…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Vandehei Developers v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Schulthess v. CarolloWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Goshen Irrigation District v. Wyoming State Board of ControlWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- RT Communications, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- BP America Production Co. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Wyoming Department of Revenue v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Voss v. Albany County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Reidy v. Stratton Sheep Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Dorr v. Wyoming Board of Certified Public AccountantsWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.