Home Indemnity Company v. Desert Palace, Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Collins, C. J.:
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered upon stipulated facts and concerns interpretation of a clause in an insurance contract. The trial judge ruled for respondent. We affirm that ruling.
Appellant, as insurer, entered into a contract of insurance protecting money and securities in transit with respondent which contained the following clause: “Loss of Money and Securities by the actual destruction, disappearance or wrongful abstraction thereof outside the Premises while being conveyed by a Messenger or any armored motor vehicle company, or while within…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Monteleone v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. Harbor Insurance Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Gerhauser v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1871
- Smith v. North American Accident InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1922
- Cleveland Avenue Liquor Store, Inc. v. Home InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hinkel Ex Rel. HinkelNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Reno's Executive Air, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1984
- United Services Automobile Association v. DokterNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Catania v. State Farm Life InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1979
- Clark v. Truck Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.