Legal Opinion

State ex rel. LetOhioVote.org v. Brunner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 2010No. 2010-0367, 2010-0415, and 2010-0421PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} These are consolidated actions for writs of prohibition to prevent respondent, Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner, from enforcing subpoenas to compel relators to appear and testify at depositions and to produce documents related to their efforts to exercise their constitutional right of referendum. Because the secretary of state did not exercise judicial or quasi-judicial authority in issuing the subpoenas, we deny the writ.

Facts

{¶ 2} Relator LetOhioVote.org is a ballot-issue committee that requested a referendum on the video-lottery-terminal (“VLT”) provisions of 2009 Am.Sub. H.B. No.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wright v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State ex rel. LetOhioVote.org v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Ohio Historical Society v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. City of Upper Arlington v. Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State ex rel. Taft v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Miller v. Warren County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State Ex Rel. Ross v. Crawford County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Cummings v. HustedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
  4. State Ex Rel. Murray v. Scioto County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State ex rel. Cornerstone Developers, Ltd. v. Greene Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API