Legal Opinion
Holliday v. Extex
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided August 10, 2006No. CIV. 05-00194SPK-LEK, CIV.05-00299 SPK-LEK, CIV.05-00319 DAE-LEKPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION’S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFFS TO RETURN PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS THAT WERE INADVERTENTLY PRODUCED; AND DENYING DEFENDANT ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
KOBAYASHI, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Rolls-Royce Corporation’s (“RRC”) Motion to Compel Plaintiffs to Return Privileged Documents that Were Inadvertently Produced (“Motion for Return”), filed July 13, 2006, and Motion for Protective Order, filed July 13, 2006. Plaintiffs Tina Holli-day, Individually, and as Special…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- METZLER CONTRACTING CO. LLC v. StephensDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2009
- Anastasi v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014
- 4-S Ranch Partners, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2020