Legal Opinion

Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 2003No. 43 WAP 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

839 A.2d 1038 (2003)

Carl R. GRADY and Diana Grady, his Wife, Appellees,

v.

FRITO-LAY, INC., a Foreign Corporation, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued March 4, 2003.

Decided December 31, 2003.

John A. Robb, Morton G. Forbes, pro hac vice, for appellant, Frito-Lay, Inc., a foreign corporation.

Mary A. Wells, pro hac vice, James Michael Beck, for appellant, for amicus curiae Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc.

John P. Joyce, Pittsburgh, for appellee, Carl R. Grady, et al.

Before RALPH J. CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, and LAMB, JJ.

OPINION

Chief Justice CAPPY.

In the…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Castille; Concurrence · Newman; Concurrence · Saylor; Concurrence · Lamb.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API