Legal Opinion
Bartels v. Christensen
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 22, 1907No. 6717PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Steiner, J., entered March 14, 1907, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to vacate a judgment foreclosing a tax lien.
1Per curiam
This is an action by the respondent to vacate and set aside a judgment obtained on a tax foreclosure proceeding. The judgment was vacated and the appeal fol-~ lowed. It is stipulated by the parties to this action that there is but one question in the case, and that is as to the sufficiency of the form of the notice or summons published, which notice or summons is set forth in appellants’ brief. The essential part of the notice to consider is as follows:
“You and each of you are hereby directed and summoned to appear within sixty days after the service of this notice and summons upon you,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thompson v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Dolan v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wick v. ReaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Moller v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Ontario Land Co. v. WilfongSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- McKeand v. BirdWashington Supreme Court · 1921