Legal Opinion
Haddad v. Baker
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 6, 2015No. Civil Action No. 15-11323-LTSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS
SOROKIN, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Philip G. Haddad filed a pro se Complaint, which the .Court interprets as alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. No. 1. Haddad brings these claims against private actors and state officials, and seeks $2.9 million in damages. The various Defendants named in the Complaint have filed three motions to dismiss. Doc. No. 21, 27, 35.
I.BACKGROUND
The facts are drawn from the Complaint. On April 12, 2012, Haddad went tó a privately-owned building at 1000 Washington Street in Boston, Massachusetts, to visit the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ondina-Gordo v. Banco Santander Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021