Legal Opinion

Scott v. Hy-Grade Food Products Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1936No. 25856PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

It is to be observed from tbe foregoing statement tbat the recovery of damages for tbe injuries sustained by tbe pedestrian, Scott, is sought from tbe owners of tbe truck upon tbe theory tbat tbe negligent operation of tbe truck was tbe proximate cause of tbe injuries complained of in tbat tbe manner of operation of tbe truck caused the automobile owned and operated by Brown to come into collision with pedestrian' Scott, and cause bis injury. Tbe theory upon which plaintiff seeks recovery is stated by bis counsel as follows:

“Before tbe truck swerved to tbe left side of tbe road, there was no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Swoboda v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. FlesherOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Pallini v. DankowskiOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Ebeling, Admx. v. Harman, Admx.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Proctor v. Kewpee, 1-08-03 (10-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Eisenhuth v. MoneyhonOhio Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API