Legal Opinion

People v. Lane

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 21, 1956No. Crim. 1061PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

Defendant was found guilty by a jury of the crime of issuing a check without sufficient funds (Pen. Code, § 476a.) He was sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison and appeals from the judgment of conviction and “from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.” The record does not show that such a motion was made and, therefore, the purported appeal from the order denying his “motion for a new trial” is dismissed.

On or about May 8, 1955, Hubert Watkins, a salesman and assistant manager in charge of the used car department for Marvin K. Brown, Cadillac and Oldsmobile, in San…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. BercovitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. People v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. WeaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. People v. WorkmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. People v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. People v. NorthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Galbreath v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. People v. SpaiseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API