Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Evans

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1925No. Docket No. 15PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff, claiming damages for fraud in a land deal in which he was the contract purchaser, sued Evans and Tinney, the real estate agents who brought about the deal, his son-in-law, Northcott, who had a part in it, and Dickinson, who held the record title. The declaration has a count on the theory of rescission of the contract, a second count claiming damages for fraud and deceit and in which rescission is not averred, and a third, the common counts in assumpsit. To review a judgment entered on verdict directed for defendants, plaintiff brings error. The controlling question is that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Swedish American National Bank of Minneapolis v. KoebernickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Burne v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Humphrey v. SieversSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Craig v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Kintz v. GalvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Timmerman v. GurnseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  2. Dertinger v. LathrupMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Pariseau v. Trinity Building Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Donaldson v. SimonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Weston v. GoldbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API