Legal Opinion
SFS Check, LLC v. First Bank
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 30, 2013No. Civ No. 12-14607PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*767 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND (DKT. 45) AND DISMISSING CASE
TERRENCE G. BERG, District Judge.
SFS Check, LLC (“Plaintiff’ or “SFS”) brings this action against First Bank of Delaware (“Defendant” or “FBD”) and nine of FBD’s directors and officers (the “Individual Defendants”) for negligence and fraud. Plaintiff now seeks leave to file a Second Amended Complaint; Defendant has responded, arguing that granting Plaintiff leave to file its proposed Second Amended Complaint would be futile, since that pleading fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- SFS Check, LLC v. First Bank of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Acrisure LLC, et al. v. John JacobiDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2026
- Coast to Coast Produce, LLC v. AMCO Produce CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- DV Injury Law, PLLC v. Tort Private Investigations LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Dobronski v. Training Force USA LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.