Legal Opinion
Curtis v. George J. Meyer Malt & Grain Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided February 21, 1947No. Civ. No. 3129PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
Corporate defendant moves to dismiss the complaint on three grounds: (1) lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, (2) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, (3) running of the statute of limitations. It also moves to strike out certain statements in the complaint and for a bill of particulars of ten specified items.
The decision of this motion requires a thorough analysis of the complaint.
Plaintiff alleges (Par. 1) that he is “the duly elected, qualified and acting Successor Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Forest City Brewery, Inc., an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Magruder v. DrurySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Jackson v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Crites, Inc. v. Prudential Ins. Co. Of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- In Re Prima Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- Baker v. SiskDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gideon J. Rohner, Jr. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Rossy v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
- Ramos Mimoso v. PuebloSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
- Owens Generator Co. v. H. J. Heinz Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1958
- Weber v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.