Legal Opinion

Samuel v. California Department of Health Services

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 31, 1983No. C-82-1829 EFL, C-82-3126 EFLPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

LYNCH, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in these related actions seek a declaration that the limitation on reimbursement to health care providers for services rendered to Medi-Cal beneficiaries who are also Medicare beneficiaries (“crossover beneficiaries”), as enacted by California Welfare & Institutions Code section 14109.5, is in violation of federal Medicaid law and regulations. Specifically, plaintiffs in No. C-82-3126 EFL seek a declaration that Welfare & Institutions Code section 14109.5 violates 42 U.S.C. section 1396(a)(15) and 42 U.S.C. section 1396h(d)(1); plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Bannon v. Town Court Nursing CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. American Medical Ass'n v. MathewsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
  3. District of Columbia Podiatry Society v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
  4. Hotel Employers Association of San Francisco v. Anne M. Gorsuch, as Administrator of Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Olszewski v. Scripps HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Pennsylvania Medical Society v. SniderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. New York City Health And Hospitals Corporation v. Cesar A. PeralesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. PeralesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. Haynes Ambulance Service, Inc. v. AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API