Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 29, 1976No. 31394PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Justice.

Certiorari was granted on the application of the state to determine if the Court of Appeals erred in holding that Code § 38-1604, as amended by Ga. L. 1957, p. 53, permits a wife to refuse to testify at a grand jury proceeding, on the ground that her testimony would incriminate her husband, where the grand jury is investigating alleged illegal drug transactions of a person other than her husband. See Smith v. State, 138 Ga. App. 683, 685 (227 SE2d 84) (1976).

Code § 38-1604, as amended by Ga. L. 1957, p. 53, provides in the first sentence: "Husband and wife shall be competent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Askea v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chancey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Stanley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Lawrence v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  4. In re a Grand Jury SubpoenaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  5. Hawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API