Legal Opinion

Bartz v. Chicago City Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 25, 1904No. Gen. No. 11,321PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action on the case for personal injuries. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edmund Burke, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1903.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Stein

delivered the opinion of the court.

First. One of the errors assigned is that the verdict is contrary to the law and to the evidence. Plaintiff has submitted a mere skeleton argument touching this assignment, in view of which the error might perhaps be considered waived. We have, however, considered the evidence and find that it fully sustains the verdict of the jury and particularly their special finding that the plaintiff by the exercise of ordinary care might have avoided the accident.

Second. After the plaintiff had rested his case it appeared °for the first time…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dow v. BlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Millikin v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Chicago City Railway Co. v. LeachIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Phenix Insurance v. CaldwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bacon v. WalshAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API