Green v. Lamarque
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEA, Circuit Judge:
While selecting a jury for a criminal trial in Alameda County, California, the prosecutor used peremptory challenges to exclude from the jury all six African-Americans on the jury panel. The African-American defendant claimed the prosecutor based such challenges on race. The prosecutor then offered race-neutral reasons which, we now conclude, also applied to unchallenged white jurors. This disparity in treatment convinces us the nonracial reasons claimed by the prosecutor were pretexts. Because the elimination of even a single juror due to race taints the trial, we reverse…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Rice v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Johnson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Robert Murray v. Dora SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Osu Student Alliance v. Ed RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Cook v. LaMarqueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. BarnetteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Keith Jamerson v. Gail LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.