Legal Opinion

Collins v. Stephens

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1877PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the City Court of Lee. Tried before tbe Hon. John C. Meadobs. Action was brought by Terry Collins, appellant, against Thomas J. Stephens, appellee.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the City Court of Lee. Tried before tbe Hon. John C. Meadobs. Action was brought by Terry Collins, appellant, against Thomas J. Stephens, appellee. The complaint contained five counts; the first and second counts being for damages to the mill leased and for breach of an agreement to run the mill at defendant’s expense, and pay one-fourth of the lumber sawed; the third, for goods, wares and merchandize; the fourth, for money paid, by request ; and the fifth, for money due by account stated. The defendant pleaded in short the general issue; performance of contract, and a set-off.…

1Opinion of the Court

STONE. J.

The 13tli charge asked should not have been given. Tbe measure of damages in a suit for tbe breach of a contract, sucb as that described in tbe complaint, is tbe injury which results proximately from tbe breach. And whether tbe parties, at tbe making of tbe contract, contemplated, or bad in view tbe damages to result from a breach of sucb contract, or not, does not, in tbe least, vary tbe question, or tbe measure of recovery. Tbe facts being ascertained, tbe law, and not tbe contemplation of the parties, declares tbe measure of damages.

Tbe testimony tends to show there were two…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daughtery v. American Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Cato v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API