Legal Opinion

Cassidy v. Teton Cnty. Coroner (In re Birkholz)

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 2019No. S-18-0156PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Justice.

[¶1] Appellants, Paul Cassidy and Bruce Hayse, M.D., filed a W.R.C.P. Rule 60 motion to set aside the Coroner's Inquest Verdict. The district court dismissed the motion, concluding it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.

ISSUE

[¶2] Appellants raise two issues, one of which is dispositive and rephrased as:

Does the district court have subject matter jurisdiction in a post-coroner inquest proceeding?

We do not address Appellants' second issue, whether post-inquest proceedings are governed by Wyoming's Administrative Procedure Act because that question is moot: the time for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Reno Livestock Corp. v. Sun Oil Co.(Delaware)Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State Ex Rel. Motor Vehicle Division v. HoltzWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Raigosa v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Wyoming Community College Commission v. Casper Community College DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  5. City of Fort Worth v. Cornyn, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mattheis Co. v. Town of JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Black Diamond Energy of Delaware Inc., a Foreign Corporation v. Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Bruce Hayse, M.D. and Paul Cassidy v. Wyoming Board of Coroner StandardsWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Powder River Basin Resource Council v. Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality and Brook Mining Company, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Mantle v. N. Star Energy & Constr. LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API