Cassidy v. Teton Cnty. Coroner (In re Birkholz)
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, Justice.
[¶1] Appellants, Paul Cassidy and Bruce Hayse, M.D., filed a W.R.C.P. Rule 60 motion to set aside the Coroner's Inquest Verdict. The district court dismissed the motion, concluding it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.
ISSUE
[¶2] Appellants raise two issues, one of which is dispositive and rephrased as:
Does the district court have subject matter jurisdiction in a post-coroner inquest proceeding?
We do not address Appellants' second issue, whether post-inquest proceedings are governed by Wyoming's Administrative Procedure Act because that question is moot: the time for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Reno Livestock Corp. v. Sun Oil Co.(Delaware)Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Motor Vehicle Division v. HoltzWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Raigosa v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Wyoming Community College Commission v. Casper Community College DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- City of Fort Worth v. Cornyn, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mattheis Co. v. Town of JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Black Diamond Energy of Delaware Inc., a Foreign Corporation v. Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Bruce Hayse, M.D. and Paul Cassidy v. Wyoming Board of Coroner StandardsWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Powder River Basin Resource Council v. Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality and Brook Mining Company, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Mantle v. N. Star Energy & Constr. LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.