Legal Opinion
Roa v. Roa
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 14, 2010No. A-72 September Term 2008PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Long
At issue on this appeal are several questions centering on the operation of the two-year statute of limitations applicable to the antiretaliation provision of New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(d). In particular, we are asked to declare whether the statute of limitations bars a retaliation claim based both on an employee’s discharge and on a post-discharge retaliatory act, where the former is beyond the two-year limitations period and the latter is not. Critical to that question is the issue of whether the post-discharge retaliatory act can constitute the last act…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- William J. Ray v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Rochon, Donald v. Gonzales, AlbertoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Estate of Hanges v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Battaglia v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- McDade v. SiazonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Guido v. Duane Morris LLP.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.