Legal Opinion

Wodecki v. West

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is a replevin action to recover possession of 32 sacks of vetch and 43 sacks of oats of the admitted value of $340. The cause was submitted to the court without the intervention of a jury. Prom a judgment in favor of defendants, the plaintiffs appeal. Respondents make no appearance.

The trial court allowed defendants’ motion for a judgment of involuntary nonsuit for the reason that there is no allegation in the complaint that the grain was wrongfully detained by defendants in Columbia county at time of the commencement of the action. Since the pleading was not challenged by demurrer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fuglede v. Wenatchee District Cooperative Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Marx & Jorgenson v. CroisanOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Ward v. HamlinOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Wheeler v. SteadmanOregon Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Allis-Chalmers Credit Corp. v. Nordyke (In Re Nordyke)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API