Schwencke v. Haffner
New York Supreme Court
" Action for partition.
1Opinion of the CourtHirschberg, J.
On the first trial of this action — a partition suit —the defense was a defect of parties defendant in that the' grandchildren of both the testator and his widow had contingent interests and were not made parties. Judgment for the plaintiff on-a trial of this issue of law was reversed and a new trial ordered. See report of case, Schwencke v. Haffner, 18 App. Div. 182. -Since that decision and on the 29th day of June, 1897, the testator’s widow died, and the rights and interests of the parties in the real estate are now to be finally determined.
Christopher Huss, the testator, died December 3,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baer v. HendricksNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Bisson v. . W.S.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Schwencke v. HaffnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Accounting of WidmannNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952
- Estate of Langdon, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1899