Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 8, 1988No. 1655PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from the denial of appellant’s Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA) petition. Appellant asserts that the PCHA court erred in dismissing the petition because trial counsel was ineffective for failing to: (1) ensure that appellant knowingly and intelligently entered his plea of nolo contendere; and (2) file a motion to modify or vacate sentence based upon the imposition of restitution in violation of the plea agreement and without a hearing regarding appellant’s ability to pay. For reasons discussed below, we affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

On…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. ForbesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. AnthonySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. GriffinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. ColesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. YanoffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. CatanchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. WrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API