Legal Opinion

De Bord v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided October 30, 1943No. 422PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSELL, District Judge.

In this case the only material question for consideration involves determination of whether under the evidence the operator of the automobile was a servant of the defendant or the employee of an independent contractor. In other words, whether the defendant was liable for the negligence of the operator of the automobile or whether such negligence was properly attributable only to the operator and his employer who had been engaged by the defendant to transfer the truck for it.

Plaintiff’s suit was predicated upon his contention that the truck was owned by the defendant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hodges v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Venuto v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  3. Yearwood v. PeabodyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  4. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  5. Graham v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eberhardy v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API