Legal Opinion · Concurrence

George C. Peterson Co. v. Ashphalt Sales Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 14, 1925No. Gen. No. 29,963Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Justice Thomson,

specially concurring: In my opinion there can be no doubt of the fact of the sufficiency of the allegations in this bill of complaint, under the sections of the Corporation Act referred to in the foregoing opinion, where the complainant is seeking the remedies provided for in those sections, as is clearly the case here.

In my opinion the case of Brethorst v. Wylie, 205 Ill. App. 72, is not applicable to the verification of the bill of complaint in the case at bar. In the case cited, the person making the affidavit of verification stated that the matters and facts contained…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stirlen v. NeustadtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  2. Brethorst v. WylieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API