Legal Opinion

Multnomah Legal Services Workers Union v. Legal Services Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 25, 1991No. 89-35762PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROTT, Circuit Judge:

Multnomah County Legal Aid Service, Incorporated (“MCLAS”) is a legal services organization funded in part by the Legal *1550Services Corporation (“LSC”)- This dispute arises from LSC’s request to view the personnel files of two MCLAS employees, which was immediately resisted by MCLAS’s union. The district court held that LSC’s demand for documents was neither necessary nor reasonable, and granted a permanent injunction prohibiting (1) release of the files, and (2) termination of MCLAS’s funding for failure to release the files. 723 F.Supp. 1398. LSC timely appeals. We have…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Olimpia TOVAR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Mary Tataranowicz v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., in His Official Capacity as Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  3. Wilkinson v. Legal Services Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  4. Protect Lake Pleasant, LLC v. McDonaldDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
  5. Multnomah Legal Services Workers Union National Organization of Legal Services Workers District 65 v. Legal Services Corp., a Nonprofit District of Columbia Corporation, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Multnomah County Legal Aid Service, Incorporated, a Nonprofit Oregon Corporation, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API