Birmingham Flooring Mills v. Wilder & Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jefferson. Tried, before the Hon. Leroy F. Box.
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
A general appearance by a defendant is a waiver of any defect in the service of the *594summons and complaint, and may ©ven dispense with, the necessity of the service of all process, the purpose of which is only to bring him into court. — Goldsmith v. Stetson & Co., 39 Ala. 183; McCaskey v. Pollock, 82 Ala. 174; 2 Brick. Dig. p. 366, §§ 81-87. Conceding that the service of the summons and complaint, as made by the sheriff in this case, was defective, because left with the wrong person— one who was no longer an officer or agent of the defendant corporation — the record shows a general appearance…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McCaskey & Ratcliff v. Pollock & CoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Berry v. FergusonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Goldsmith v. Stetson & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1863
- Pitts v. District of OpelikaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ex Parte AshtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Dickson v. Alabama MacHinery & Supply Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1921
- Ex Parte CullinanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Stull v. Daniel MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Butler v. WaltonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.