Legal Opinion

Alexander J. Matturri v. United States Civil Service Commission

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 19, 1956No. 11722_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The only substantial question in this case is whether the term “principal employment” as used in section 12(a) of the Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 118k(a), relates to public employment alone or refers to private employment as well so that both types of employment must be considered in determining which is principal. The district court took the latter view, concluding that the petitioner’s private law practice was his principal employment, and ruled that he was not subject to the act because of his membership in the Newark Housing Authority. The reasons for the district court’s action are fully…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matturi v. United States Civil Service CommissionDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1955

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Engelhardt v. United States Civil Service CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1961
  2. Smyth v. United States Civil Service CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1968
  3. In Re RamshawDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1967
  4. Burke v. BennettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Burke v. BennettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API