Legal Opinion
In Re Ramshaw
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided February 20, 1967No. Civ. 4-66-33PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER and JUDGMENT
McNICHOLS, District Judge.
Petitioners W. E. Ramshaw and the State of Idaho, pursuant to Section 12(c) of the Hatch Political Activities Act of 1939, 1 hereinafter referred to as the Act, seek review of a United States Civil Service Commission Report and Order dated August 31,1966. The Commission action here in dispute found Petitioner Ramshaw to be in violation of Section 12(a) of the Act, 2 and that such violation warranted his removal from employment. Jurisdiction here exists under 5 U.S.C. § 1508.
As required by the Act, a certified transcript of the record upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Oklahoma v. United States Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Board of Trade of Kansas City v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Engelhardt v. United States Civil Service CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1961
- Oklahoma v. United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smyth v. United States Civil Service CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1968
- Swinney v. UntreinerSupreme Court of Florida · 1973