Mid-Continent Telephone Corp. v. Home Telephone Co.
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON THE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE THAT PLAINTIFF CANNOT MAINTAIN ITS ACTION BECAUSE OF ILLEGALLY TRANSACTING BUSINESS WITHIN THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
READY, Chief Judge.
This diversity action for damages and injunctive relief arising from alleged breach of contract is brought against Home Telephone Company (Home), Lon J. Darley, Rex B. Darley and Union Telephone Company of Mississippi, Inc., all being Mississippi citizens, by Mid-Continent Telephone Corporation (Mid-Continent), which is an Ohio citizen. Defendants have pleaded, as an affirmative defense, that Mid-Continent is doing…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Woods v. Interstate Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mid-Continent Telephone Corp. v. Home Telephone Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1970
- Yarborough v. Schoolfield Furniture Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Alford v. WhitselDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1971
- Goldrick v. D. M. Picton Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1971
- Ivor B. Clark Co. of Texas, Inc. v. Southern Business & Industrial Development Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.