Evansville & Terre Haute Railway Co. v. Welch
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Sullivan Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenley, J.
—The appellant by proper assignment of error questions the ruling of the lower court in holding *309appellee’s complaint good against a demurrer for want of sufficient facts. The facts stated in the complaint are substantially the following: That the town of Earmersburg is incorporated and has about 1,000 inhabitants, and is provided with streets, sidewalks, and alleys; that appellant has and maintains a depot and station in said town which is located near the central part of said town at the west side of appellant’s track and immediately along the side thereof; that the south end of said station…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Sjogren v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- S. S. Pass Ry. Co. v. TrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Richards v. RoughMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Wood v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Engle v. Director General of RailroadsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Indiana Service Corporation v. JohnstonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
- Kelly v. DAVIDSONIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Zokhrabov v. ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.