Legal Opinion

Richards v. Rough

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1884PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Error to Berrien. (A. J. Smith, J.) Case. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

The plaintiff brings his action on the case for injuries received while in the employ of defendants, using machinery which he alleges was unsafe. The defendants are partners, and for many years have been largely engaged in carrying on the business of manufacturing wagons at Buchanan, in this State. They are not mechanics. Their business in the shops, at the time the accident complained of occurred, was under the general management of M. S. Mead, against whose competency for the position nothing appears in this record. Tie had the general superintendence of the entire business at the works,…

2Cited by38 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GroegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Tuttle v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. American Brewing Ass'n v. TalbotSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. Gowen v. HarleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API