State v. Boyd
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
This case presents the question of whether two criminal charges arose out of the “same act or transaction” within the meaning of the double-jeopardy rule of State v. Brown, 262 Or 442, 497 P2d 1191 (1972).
On January 15, 1974 police officers executed a search warrant at defendant’s residence. The officers *218found a stolen television set and amphetamine tablets. Defendant was arrested at that time.
On January 23, 1974 the grand jury indicted defendant for first-degree theft, ORS 164.055, based on the arresting officers’ testimony concerning defendant’s possession of the stolen television. On…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. FitzgeraldOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. FairOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- State v. McDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BoydOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. HammangCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- State v. TantonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. MatischeckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- State v. PaquinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.