Townley v. Exchange Nat. Bank
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BRANSON, V. C. J.
The plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, sued the defendant in error, as defendant, to recover $1,000. His cause of action was, in brief, the outgrowth of a certain check drawn in favor of the plaintiff by E. Westerman. The cheek was dated January 23, 1920. It seems to have been given as a part payment on an in- - tended purchase of a piece of real estate located in Tulsa, which was never consummated.
The drawer of the check and' the payee thereof both carried accounts in the defendant bank. The 21st day of February, 1920, was Saturday, and shortlyi before noon and at a time when…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Bank v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- American Exchange National Bank v. GreggIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Woodward v. Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Pollack v. National Bank of CommerceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- First National Bank, Paris v. McKeen.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Tilley v. Security State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938