Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Payne

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1938No. Civ. 5997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The plaintiff in this action had judgment ordering and decreeing the cancellation of a certain assessment levied on property belonging to the plaintiff for the fiscal year 1935-1936. From this judgment the defendants appeal.

The allegations of the complaint are to,the effect that the assessment referred to was illegal, discriminatory, confiscatory and fraudulent, and that the plaintiff was denied the right of appearing before the board of equalization to give testimony as to the value of the property assessed, and the reasons why the assessment should be reduced.

The record shows that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pardee v. Schuylkill CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Rees v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Benton v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. In Re Tax Assessments Against Pocahontas Land Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. DeMille v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API