Legal Opinion
Llewelyn v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1949No. 7166PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRATT, Chief Justice.
In this case Winnetta J. Llewelyn, the widow of Isaiah J. Llewelyn, deceased, seeks compensation as a dependent under Section 42-1-67, U. C. A. 1943 (of our Industrial Accident Code). The Industrial Commission denied her compensation for the following reason, as they state it:
“That the applicant was not living with the deceased at the time of his accident or his death; that she received no support whatever from him for several years prior to his death; that she was therefore not dependent upon deceased for support, at the time of his accidental injury and death.”
Section…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cawley v. CawleyUtah Supreme Court · 1921
- Diaz v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1932
- Utah Apex Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- Anderson v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1919
- American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sherman v. Cabildo Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Cepeda Canales v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
- Cepeda Canales v. Industrial Commission of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954