Legal Opinion

Llewelyn v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1949No. 7166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, Chief Justice.

In this case Winnetta J. Llewelyn, the widow of Isaiah J. Llewelyn, deceased, seeks compensation as a dependent under Section 42-1-67, U. C. A. 1943 (of our Industrial Accident Code). The Industrial Commission denied her compensation for the following reason, as they state it:

“That the applicant was not living with the deceased at the time of his accident or his death; that she received no support whatever from him for several years prior to his death; that she was therefore not dependent upon deceased for support, at the time of his accidental injury and death.”

Section…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cawley v. CawleyUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Diaz v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Utah Apex Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Anderson v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1919
  5. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sherman v. Cabildo Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  2. Cepeda Canales v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  3. Cepeda Canales v. Industrial Commission of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API