Legal Opinion

Horn v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 27, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Reversing.

The question on this appeal is whether a drainage district may be organized within the limits of an established drainage district to meet the peculiar needs of a portion of the district.

The question arises in the following way: Prior to the proceeding the Daviess county court, on the petition of a large number of landowners, organized the Panther Creek Drainage District for the purpose of straightening, widening and deepening Panther creek, which is a large stream with two forks, known as North Panther and South Panther, with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Board of Trustees v. WebbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Drainage Commissioners v. WebbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. People ex rel. Bancroft v. LeaseIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Mittman v. FarmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Drainage Commissioners of Washington County District, No. 4 v. Eastern Home & Farm Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor Coal Co. v. Board of Drainage CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Adams v. HornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Board of Drainage Commissioners v. Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API