Horn v. Adams
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
William Rogers Clay, Commissioner
Reversing.
The question on this appeal is whether a drainage district may be organized within the limits of an established drainage district to meet the peculiar needs of a portion of the district.
The question arises in the following way: Prior to the proceeding the Daviess county court, on the petition of a large number of landowners, organized the Panther Creek Drainage District for the purpose of straightening, widening and deepening Panther creek, which is a large stream with two forks, known as North Panther and South Panther, with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Board of Trustees v. WebbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Drainage Commissioners v. WebbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- People ex rel. Bancroft v. LeaseIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Mittman v. FarmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Drainage Commissioners of Washington County District, No. 4 v. Eastern Home & Farm Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Taylor Coal Co. v. Board of Drainage CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Adams v. HornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Board of Drainage Commissioners v. Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924