Legal Opinion
International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. Aloha Airlines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 13, 1985No. 83-2558PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM) appeals the district court’s partial summary judgment order denying its motion to compel arbitration. We find that we have jurisdiction over this appeal and affirm.
FACTS
On December 6, 1979, Aloha Airlines, Inc. (Aloha), a common carrier under section 201 of the Railway Labor Act (the Act), 45 U.S.C. § 181 (1982), entered into a collective bargaining agreement (“Basic Agreement”) with the IAM, the union representative of Aloha’s “clerical unit” employees. 1 The Basic Agreement contained a grievance…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. BodingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. United Transportation UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Bensel v. Allied Pilots Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Deba Edelman v. Western Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Utility Workers of America, Local No. 246, Afl-Cio Jeanette Cintron Alan Rook, Cross-Appellees v. Southern California Edison Company, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. Aloha Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.