Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Amphenol Corp. & Microlab

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEmilio Nunez, J.

Motion for an order pursuant to CPLR 7503 (subd. [b]) staying arbitration is denied.

Microlab purchased an entire going business from the petitioner (Amphenol). The agreement was entered into on August 18,1964. On September 1,1964 questions arose as to petitioner’s representations as they existed in the contract. During the ensuing year attempts at negotiation were made respecting representation and performance of the contract. Settlement *47negotiations were terminated on September 21, 1965, and Micro-lab served its demand for arbitration on September 24, 1965.

Petitioner asserts that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration between Fabrex Corp. & Winard Sales Co.New York Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Hamilton Life Insurance Company of New York v. Republic National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  3. Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Housekeeper v. LourieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  5. Hamilton Life Ins. Co. of NY v. Republic Nat. Life Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API