In re the William P. Bray Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Chief Judge.
Petitioner for review, a creditor, attacks the award of a balance of retained funds in the hands of a city to .the surety on the bonds of the bankrupt. The bankrupt was a construction company. The surety had paid out more than the balance of the retained funds in carrying out its obligation under the completion and payment bonds of the bankrupt guaranteeing performance of two sewer contracts between the bankrupt and the city, the bankrupt having abandoned the contracts after partial completion.
There is no attack made on the referee’s finding of facts, which is hereby…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Danais v. M. De Matteo Const. Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1952
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. City of AstoriaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1919
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blumin v. EllisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. Bellmead State Bank of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Federal Insurance v. Constructora Maza, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1979
- In Re Merts Equipment Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.