Legal Opinion

Fayad v. Sebelius

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 25, 2011No. Case No. 09-14119PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment [dkts 18 & 21], The motions have been fully briefed. The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the parties’ papers such that the decision process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Therefore, pursuant to E.D. Mich. L.R. 7.1(f)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that the motions be resolved on the briefs submitted. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment [dkt 18] is DENIED, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Margaret FELISKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. White v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. US Ex Rel. Hobbs v. Medquest Associates, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2011
  2. LILIA GOROVITS, M.D., P.C. v. AZARDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Pawlowski v. BecerraDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API